Friday, September 24, 2010

My Take on Writing Compelling Characters: Quirks and Attitude

You know what's compelling? New. Or revived, before it's trendy. Once anything goes trendy, it is no longer compelling. There are a million archetypes out there, and some of them are really popular. Popular is boring. I noticed recently that the same exact character seems to headline the most popular TV shows lately. He is:
- Uniquely genius in some way, and no one else can match him.
- Single
- A silver foxy type
- Sarcastic
- He seems to seduce all of the strong professional women he works with or for
- He is often European or Australian (and if not, the actor playing him is!)
- He is white
- He is a pessimist
- He is a loner
Can you guess who I'm referring to?? How about Gregory House (House), Dr. Lightman (Lie To Me), Patrick "Jane" Jane (The Mentalist), Dr. Paul Westin (In Treatment).... Feel free to keep listing them. Yea, they are funny, strangely sexy, and easy to watch week after week. But guess what? They are no longer compelling. They were... once upon a time. But not anymore. The current juggernauts will be fine, but new ones will not reach the peaks where House sits. So good luck with landing a deal with a knock off . [Although, I would sell my soul to Tom Cruise for a ticket to see Craig Ferguson do parodies for all of these shows.]

But you know who isn't so popular? (Women of the same description, for one!) Pissed off women. How about recreational drug users who are not junkies going to rehab? Female characters who are a bit rough around the edges, without a secret Betty Crocker side waiting to redeem her scandalous ways? What about people who have an attitude problem that we could actually relate to? (House and the like are not relateable characters, when was the last time you felt alone and misunderstood for your personal brand of moody/infallible genius?)

Which character have you seen more of:
A) Woman who is seen as sexy. She plays more than just hard to get, she never gives it up. She leaves just the right amount of allure to hook 'em, but never lures them in. All the men in her life wish they could tap that, but she doesn't realize that she is waiting for a man who is even more confident and elusive than her. Only he can pull the sword from the stone (uh, or the opposite in this case).
OR
B) Woman who is seen as sexy. She does what ever the hell works for her. She doesn't think much about the drooling guys at the office, yet they still drool. She hangs out with a few buddies, some men and some women, and the guys aren't trying bed her for the conquest. When she is interested in a man, she might pursue him, if she's in the mood. This woman actually knows what she wants without a man having to seduce her.

The latter may not sound much like women we see in the media. She isn't a big headliner. But who do most women rather aspire to? Who is more realistic? Who would people actually respect? Yea.

The point is we see a lot of female characters who have a soft core (when it all comes down to it), and a lot of male characters who have had their emotions removed and the void filled with sarcasm. Switch it up. People can still love a female character who is usually cheesed off and sarcastic. People will run with a guy who can't get the girl. Hell, break ALL the rules of what people expect in a character of a certain age, gender, profession. Bet you'll come up with someone who no one can stop reading about. We love new, weird, and strange. So bring it on!

P.S. yes, I know Jane had a sad family tragedy thing, House is disabled... blah blah blah. Still basically the same guy. Oh, and Brennen from "Bones" is an awesome example of the new and different I'm talking about.

This post is for the blogfest hosted by elana johnson, so go check it out and get in on it!

22 comments:

  1. Interesting and thought provoking. Brava.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @ Lake: Thanks : ) I was a little worried after pressing post that it was more moody and bitchy haha, I was on a bit of a tangent and rushing to finish.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That was fantastic! Definitely thought provoking... and now I'm thinking of what I have worked into my characters that is too common... wow - thanks for your entry. This was great! And so right!

    ReplyDelete
  4. How provocative. Obviously I have some thinking to do... thanks for sparking the process.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ DL and Melissa: Provocative is always my favorite compliment! (unless it's coming from my mother, in which case it is intended as an insult lol)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree the stereotypical characters make me gag ;p but then sometimes it's hard to see what you think was original isn't. It's good to have a hard critiquer in these instances :)

    http://damselinadirtydress.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great post. Love your point about breaking all the rules :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. your posts are very challenging am off to tweak my characters a bit, see if they'll let me. I think I figured out how to get the fish

    ReplyDelete
  9. I found this interesting and thought provoing,
    being a poet it has a different concept to writing a story, but I am learning so much from this blogfest.
    Thanks for teaching me a little bit more.

    Enjoy your week-end.
    Yvonne.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It's a really unique take on the character blogfest! When Elana, Jen, and I planned it, we knew the entries would be unique, but I am really impressed by the diversity!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ohmygosh, I love House! Nice post, informative!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Love this post! A different take from what I've seen so far.
    And Bones? I love her! Quirky definately describes her;-)

    ReplyDelete
  13. I haven't watched TV in several years, but, remember Murphy Brown? Her character broke the female TV stereotypes of the day. Oh and pit Rosanne Barr against June Cleaver. :)

    Great post. Lots to think about.

    Peace,
    Cindy.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Great post...It's interesting how tv stars seem to come and go in personality groups...

    ReplyDelete
  15. Brilliant and well thought out.I salute you! :O)

    ReplyDelete
  16. I still adore Gregory House, I find him fascinating, however if you were to make a replica of him on another show or another book I wouldn't read him.

    I love how the new characters are molding, they are more in depth, more sarcastic, broken, independent. That's what makes amazing characters.

    Your take was awesome and different from the others. I loved it! Thanks for participating in all the fun.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Yes, why can't a woman just be rough around the edges, like guys. She doesn't always needed to be redeemed and there will never be another like HOUSE. I'm sure of it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I like strong women character with a sense of purpose and adventure, whose heart is still working despite a bruise or two upon it.

    You wrote a thought-provoking, interesting post. Thanks, Roland

    ReplyDelete
  19. Oh, this was FABULOUS! Sorry I didn't get over here in a more timely manner. This is SO TRUE! Though I've been watching series that come highly recommended on DVD and the sarcastic, unique brand of genius in female form brought to mind Veronica Mars--but she got away with it as a high school kid, and one season of it as a college student and she got cancelled, so maybe that says something, too.

    Sadly, in one of my favorite shows has a heroine like that: Castle. But the MAN (LOVE Nathan Fillion) is not sarcastic... own unique genius, yes, but I can't resist the writer getting all excited by the twists and turns, and his playful egomania that keeps getting turned down is amusing to me.

    I really take to heart though, that PEOPLE get tired of it, but INDUSTRY wants 'sure thing' so they seem to pick copy-cats of what is working.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Interesting posts. I'll always love House though. I enjoyed your take on the blogfest.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hi,

    Ha ha, love that you have a pic of Hugh Laurie (House)! Over here in the UK we tend to remember him as the soppy/foppy Bertie Wooster, and most every part he ever played (over here) was a tad wimpish/Hugh Grantish, so I bet he was in seventh heaven when he took on the role of an arrogant evil-eyed doc.

    As for pissed off kick-ass women, we got loads of them gracing our TV screens - as cops, lawyers, secret agents!

    Re blogfests: fun being the optimum word and, a chance for feedback on voice, style, and content. ;)
    best
    F

    ReplyDelete

In case you're wondering, I LOVE COMMENTS! And I read every single one no matter how many there are :) And feel free to put your blog link in your comment, that way I can stop by your site!

Related Posts with Thumbnails